We’re often told a war “started” at a specific moment.
That framing raises a deeper question:
What are wemeasuring when we say when a war began?
In this episode, I examine how timelines in conflicts like the Israel–Palestine conflict and the Russia–Ukraine war are presented—and what gets left out when complex histories are compressed into a single starting point.
When a timeline is simplified, it can:
- reshape how responsibility is perceived
- influence which solutions seem possible
- and determine how urgency is communicated
I explore a pattern:
the difference between when a conflict becomes visible—and when it actually began.
This isn’t about taking sides or rewriting history.
It’s about asking better questions:
- What conditions existed long before the “start date”?
- What changed to make the conflict visible now?
- And what has to be true for resolution to become possible?
If you want to think beyond headlines and understand how framing shapes perception, this episode is for you.
Listen on:
Related Episodes:
Russia’s Endgame: Nikola Mikovic, The Truth About the War in Ukraine
Related Articles:
The Truth About the War in Ukraine: A Conflict Far Older—and More Complex—Than We’re Told