Listen on:
Apple Podcasts | Spotify
What if part of the Israel – Iran conflict is not about oil, politics, or ideology — rather about how states behave once survival and continuity become the organizing principle? In this episode, I explore the logic of the state:
- why nations organize around preserving themselves
- why some conflicts become inflexible
- why support for opposing regional forces may be interpreted as existential threat rather than political disagreement.
Using the American Indian analogy as a structural thought experiment, not a moral equivalence, we examine how states tend to think once continuity, territory, identity, and survival become central to decision making.
This episode is not about taking sides.
It's about asking better questions: What problem does the system believe it is solving?
Solve the right problem.
Prefer reading? → Read the article
Listen on:
About the Host
Daniel Stih is an aerospace engineer, software engineer, indoor environmental consultant, and author of 12 books. Through engineering, environmental investigations, and interdisciplinary research, he explores how people define problems, interpret evidence, and make decisions under uncertainty. Learn more in Why I Think This Way.